Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

They say they want a market-based culture. The market has been speaking for years.

AT&T used to compete for the best talent in the country. Today, it feels like we’re competing for the best talent willing to relocate to a handful of hub cities and accept five-day RTO.

The people walking out the door aren’t just headcount. They’re decades of institutional knowledge, technical expertise, customer relationships, and experience that can’t be replaced by posting another job opening.

“Leadership” seems to think talent is interchangeable. But we know it isn’t.

You can backfill a position in a few months. It can take years for someone to become truly effective in many of these roles, and by then they may already be looking for their next opportunity.

A real market-based culture works both ways. If you expect employees to compete in the market every day, then the company has to compete for employees too. That means offering a compelling reason to stay, whether that’s compensation, flexibility, culture, career growth, or meaningful work.

Right now, it feels like the strategy is to shrink the talent pool through geography, push experienced people out, and hope everything works out.

Hope isn’t a strategy and neither is assuming talent is infinitely replaceable.


by
| 21 views | | 9 replies (last 27 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kz3az7fg

9 replies (most recent on top)

I am going to leave this company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dz+1kz3az7fg

The fact they want everyone in the middle of the pay band means we’re not market based. Market based would reward those doing better and vice versa.

They want you to work as if your market based but not reward you as market based.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @by+1kz3az7fg

@b0

You mean those people hired in with no "leadership" structure above them, no responsibilities, no metrics, no goals, no status reporting, nothing? Just sitting on payroll, deciding what to do on their own, week in and week out?

Sounds like the problems lie a rung or three up the career ladder.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bx+1kz3az7fg

They are looking for people in their first role out of college, and they will use them until they figure out that they don’t like the culture, the absent training, and the commute. They’ll leave within 2 years, because they can.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bd+1kz3az7fg

They don’t see you as talent, they see you as an expense. They only consider themselves and their fellow leadership as talent. Everyone else is a peasant and cog in the machine.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1kz3az7fg

Leadership are contractual based in our case we got left over from a bad business deal that when we off loaded that company they left them behind and now we know why. They move place to place not accountable do the damage and contract ends and move on. Look at the four or five VP’s and above are on contracts, really highly paid contractors. What ever happened to start and learn from the bottom and learn not higher executives that have no idea hired because they talk the talk

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b4+1kz3az7fg

RTO might be because they are paying a lot of people $$$ to use autoclickers, mouse movers and coffee badging.

Those people ruined it for everyone.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1kz3az7fg

RTO gutted the company. The people leaving are the ones they really should want to keep around.

When 40% of this company, as it stands today, retires out in the next 5 years, there will be a major talent and knowledge crisis.

People don’t want to stick around here anymore and attracting anyone new is near impossible with the bad press around treatment of employees, bad policy like 5x RTO and the constant shuffling of jobs around the world.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1kz3az7fg

#AYYS

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1kz3az7fg

Post a reply

: