Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

An Open Letter Regarding the Strategic Direction and Future of Verizon

To: Dan Schulman, CEO of Verizon

Dear Mr. Schulman,

As a dedicated stakeholder, I want to acknowledge the ambitious goals set for Verizon. Reclaiming market leadership and maintaining a dominant industry position is a vision we all share. Navigating a hyper-competitive landscape requires a strong strategy, and the need for organizational evolution is well understood.

However, I wish to offer constructive feedback regarding the current implementation of this strategy. While cost efficiency is a standard business lever, a heavy reliance on continuous workforce reductions has created a culture defined more by uncertainty than by innovation. Significant personnel losses deplete institutional knowledge and place immense operational pressure on remaining teams. When workloads increase while teams face ongoing structural changes, morale and engagement inevitably decline. Furthermore, these internal pressures appear to be manifesting externally in our service quality with multiple network and system outages we have seen recently. Long-term corporate value relies heavily on the stability and well-being of the professionals executing the strategy.

Since the broader transition to 5G, there has been a noticeable shift in network performance compared to the legacy 4G era, with users occasionally experiencing connectivity gaps in high-traffic or residential environments. Verizon’s primary competitive advantage has historically been its gold-standard reliability. Prioritizing aggressive cost-cutting over network excellence risks erasing the differentiation between us and our competitors. To protect the customer base and reduce churn, a return to highly available and resilient network is essential.

I urge you to consider a more balanced approach to this transformation—one that prioritizes technological innovation and infrastructure over continued personnel reductions. Let us ensure Verizon leads the industry by investing in groundbreaking products and services that competitors cannot easily reproduce. A long-term legacy is best built on technical superiority and a motivated, stable workforce.

Thank you for your time and leadership in considering these operational perspectives.


by
| 12 views | | 8 replies (last 13 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m06dan20

8 replies (most recent on top)

True but Dan could care less.
He cares more about the AI race which will ultimately lead to customer dissatisfaction.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ce+1m06dan20

THIS ! was good : "FYI - he answers emails"
Oh ! that was awesome ....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1m06dan20

FYI - he answers emails

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1m06dan20

If you think Dan GsAF about anything but RIFs and AI, I have some nice ocean front property in Nebraska I'd like to sell you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aq+1m06dan20

why do you even care enough about a dying has-been company to waste time writing anything like this, just move on....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1m06dan20

Now post this on linked in and tag him.

I couldn't help but think of Verizon a little bit like a Honda or even Toyota engine. Years ago, they were rock solid, run forever, easy maintenance. Now they've made switches to turbos and there are either documented issues or whispers of less reliability. So to is the Verizon network.. less reliable or viewed as same as others.. and now our version of Hyundai has come up to out compete Verizon in many cases.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1m06dan20

Dan isn’t capable of writing this. He has successfully destroyed Verizon as a whole. Workforce moral is at an all time low. It’s been made clear that Dan don’t give a damn about his people so obviously the people aren’t going to give a damn about the job. The Verizon family has shrunk by over 16k members over the last 9 months and the writing is on the wall for others. No job is worst than one where you have to wonder if you’re on the list of cuts. Good luck to all the people that remain and let me assure you. The grass is greener on the other side and the level of toxicity is much lower as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1m06dan20

I really hope you got AI to spew this out because if you wrote this yourself, shareholder value is the least of your worries.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1m06dan20

Post a reply

: