Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

LBJ Innovation: A Culture Built on Fear, Politics, Self-Preservation, and Discrimination

Nike employees below management already know how the system works. The people closest to the work carry the deadlines, solve the problems, document the processes, train the teams, and rescue failing projects. Management controls the narrative. When the work succeeds, leadership takes the visibility. When it fails, an individual contributor takes the blame.

Employees are told to be bold, challenge convention, speak candidly, and bring their full selves to work. But the real rules are very different. Do not challenge the wrong manager. Do not expose incompetence. Do not question favoritism. Do not document too much. Do not become inconvenient. And do not expect HR to protect you from leadership.

At LBJ Innovation, politics can matter more than performance. Personal relationships can matter more than expertise. Loyalty to management can matter more than loyalty to the work. Employees quickly learn that speaking up is only encouraged when what they say is safe, flattering, and easy to ignore. Raise a serious concern and suddenly the conversation becomes about your tone. Document a pattern and you become difficult. Ask for accountability and you become the problem.

The same company that publicly celebrates inclusion can become remarkably efficient at protecting itself when employees raise concerns about discrimination, retaliation, disability, or unequal treatment. That is how fear becomes culture. It does not require everyone to agree. It only requires enough people to understand the consequences of speaking honestly.

Employees watch underperforming managers survive while strong contributors disappear. They watch favoritism get reframed as trust, political loyalty get rewarded as leadership, and self-preservation get dressed up as business judgment. They watch the people doing the actual work treated as replaceable while those managing appearances protect their titles, reputations, and stock awards.

Most employees see it. Few feel safe enough to say it. That silence is not proof that the culture is healthy. It is proof that the consequences are understood.

Nike does not have a shortage of talent. It has a leadership accountability problem. Innovation cannot thrive where employees are afraid to speak. Inclusion cannot exist where vulnerable employees are treated as liabilities. Accountability cannot exist where managers control the story and workers absorb the consequences.

Culture is not what appears in a town hall, an employee survey, or a presentation about values. Culture is what happens when someone tells the truth and leadership decides what to do with them.

The people doing the work already know what the culture is.

They live it every day.


by
| 12 views | | 7 replies (last 21 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kz4mdkmj

7 replies (most recent on top)

@dm fu-k you a--hole.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @179+1kz4mdkmj

I'll never forgive LBJ for the Gulf of Tonkin resolution. Not ever!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dm+1kz4mdkmj

That is the Nike culture. Pretend to be doing well except during earnings calls

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d2+1kz4mdkmj

It's not just Innovation that has this problem. More like Nike as a whole than one tower.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ap+1kz4mdkmj

At the upper levels divorced from the day to day work and problem solving, the "leadership" work becomes about politicking to secure budget and scope, and accruing loyalty to secure their position. Leads want to hire and promote those that can maintain this harmony and swear allegiance.
Completely opposite to the company's kool-aid of being a rebel, prefontaine blah blah, challenging the status quo to push to greatness. There is no innovation without sacrifice, but the leaders here have long forgotten what that means, or never knew it to begin with.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1kz4mdkmj

Exactly. The issue is not that employees cannot see what is happening. The issue is that they understand the professional consequences of saying it publicly.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1kz4mdkmj

@OP This post is not about one person, one manager, or one isolated incident. It is about patterns that many employees recognize but may not feel safe discussing publicly.

Have you seen strong contributors pushed aside while politically protected managers remained untouched? Have you watched “speak up” culture disappear the moment someone raised a serious concern? Have you seen favoritism presented as trust, retaliation reframed as performance management, or silence rewarded as professionalism?

Share only what you feel comfortable sharing. Do not identify yourself, coworkers, or confidential projects. The purpose is not to expose individual employees. It is to make visible the culture that leadership has been allowed to ignore.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1kz4mdkmj

Post a reply

: