Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

AT&T Is Walking Straight Into a Talent Cliff

Most of the people working here today probably won’t be here three years from now. That’s the part “leadership” seems to be completely missing.

There are huge numbers of employees already past Rule of 75 who are just waiting for the right severance offer or their retirement date, whichever comes first. Add in everyone without a pension who is already looking for the exit, and AT&T is about to lose an enormous amount of institutional knowledge. And who’s replacing them?

AT&T has spent years cutting, freezing, consolidating and making the place less attractive to the exact people who are supposed to become the next generation of experts. You can’t keep gutting the workforce and then act surprised when there’s nobody left who knows how to do the work.

Stankey is right that demographics are a problem. He’s just looking at the wrong side of the equation.

The answer isn’t simply squeezing more work out of fewer people. It’s retaining the people under 55, developing replacements before the experienced workforce walks out the door, and actually giving talented people a reason to build a career here.

Instead, we’re making the job less attractive with 5x RTO, cutting benefits, cutting headcount and watching experienced people walk. You can’t retire decades of knowledge and replace it with a PowerPoint and a new hire.

AT&T is going to find out very quickly that you can’t cut your way through a talent shortage.


by
| 52 views | | 18 replies (last 9 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kzzxetny

18 replies (most recent on top)

@ax news flash...competitors are laying off. Hello. ??

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bp+1kzzxetny

track hours, track presence - make us feel as helpdesk - who cares about results or success or talent ..

that sure works great

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nb+1kzzxetny

They do.not.care. Leadership has been warned, and yet, its a risk they won't even acknowledge. Stop trying to 'make' them understand.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @n8+1kzzxetny

@ez You need to mention that the reduction of the segment rates does not apply to mobility management. This softens the blow.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g5+1kzzxetny

@b4
I bet you are strong as a ox.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fd+1kzzxetny

@b4 With your grammar, I believe you truly are HR.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fb+1kzzxetny

@b4 You go girl!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fa+1kzzxetny

with interest rates on the rise, people will get a shock when viewing the retirement plan lump sum decrease come December. Many would do better to bail out now while last year’s GATT or whatever rate is the rule.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ez+1kzzxetny

@b4 You are as delusional as Stankey himself. Make sure you give yourself a big pat on the back when your "loyalty" is rewarded with a layoff notice. I'm sure the taste from Mr. Stankey's crack will all be all the reward you need.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ck+1kzzxetny

A PHD at ATT is not the flex you think it is. I agree with your post

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cj+1kzzxetny

@aa
Best post! 👏

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bk+1kzzxetny

The only talent Dallas is after is creative financing talent. They need gifted money launderers to keep borrowing from Peter to pay Paul and buy back enough stock to keep their bonuses up. The work they believe can be done by whatever 3rd world country bids the lowest. This is what happens when you put MBAs and finance bros in charge of engineers and technical people.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bf+1kzzxetny

@b4 Is a "heavy lifting" example the presence reports? Or is it setting up every 20 minute pings on employees devices to see where they are? Maybe badge swipe and laptop keyboard stroke monitoring? A random 4 pm walk on the floor to see who left early? Maybe I'm forgetting the other ways HR focuses on all the wrong things and invade our privacy?

Regardless thanks for all you do. Our stock price reflects your hard work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bc+1kzzxetny

@b4 original poster here. I have a PHD. You probably have a communications degree from a community college. Sit down.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1kzzxetny

Probably a response by a Low level person, who is degree challenged and thinks they are a HR expert. Leave the heavy lifting to us, sit this one out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b4+1kzzxetny

They've created this mess. When people leave, they are so burned out from this place and the last thing they want to do is knowledge transfer. You eff'ing figure it out.

Not to mention a LOT of people leave here and go to a competitor. That's where the knowledge transfer is happening. They can pretend like this remains a desirable workplace but there's literally no data or Reddit threads to support it.

We be sc--wed!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1kzzxetny

I'm not worried - look at John's track record. One successful decision after another. He's got this. :/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1kzzxetny

People on my project are doing the work of multiple people who have left. There aren't enough hours to do everything so many things are simply dropped. Unfortunately, prioritization isn't always the best and things dropped later become crises when somebody higher up needs the information and "doesn't understand" why it wasn't done. Everyone seems to have their own idea of what is more important.

When someone leaves, it's not a knowledge transfer on how a system works but only "how do you get that information". So when something needs to be changed or breaks, nobody knows how to change it. Requirement and dessign documents (when they even exist) don't take the place of true knowledge transfers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1kzzxetny

Post a reply

: