Thread regarding Optum layoffs

Optum Selloff Strategy

I want to preface everything with the fact that I have no idea if they’re actually planning to absorb minimal tech resources into UHG and then sell Optum. This is just a rumor that I read previously on this site.

I have two questions:

Does anyone know if this rumor has any merit?

If the rumor is true, how do you think they’ll draw the line in the sand? What teams will stay and what teams will be sold off? Will it be split by leader, onshore/offshore, etc?

I genuinely don’t know what outcome would be best. I’m just kind of curious if I can predict where my job will land.


by
| 55 views | | 18 replies (last July 15) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kw2ct6s0

18 replies (most recent on top)

@OP 2026 is a holding pattern. motions will take place in 2027 as we retrench to support UHC. a lot of Optum distractions will go away including SD

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @30h+1kw2ct6s0

The Optum empire was built around its PBM and pharmacy business—the flagship asset ORX. OH came next, with OI/OA/OF rounding out the portfolio.

The board quietly prepared to divest the PBM before regulators forced the issue, while Health looked increasingly like a business the company no longer had the appetite to run.

OT reports directly to the UHG parent rather than Optum or the Payer, its structure optimized as much for financial optics as for engineering.

OI, despite its $20B valuation, served largely as the company's AI showcase—a story for investors as much as a business.

Then came the reorg. UHC executives flowed into Insight, the org chart was dismantled, and Lou inherited a new three-vertical operating model spanning sales, operations, and product. Internal products are replaced with vendor stuff, SD prepared to rebrand Insight, Assist, and Frontier as "Optum AI," and, after the launch, exited the stage by end of 2026, leaving Lou to run the new company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zy+1kw2ct6s0

@dt which

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rv+1kw2ct6s0

@gf Wellmed is a child of Optum, lol! It’s interesting how clueless some people are, especially some in UHC. They have no idea how many groups Optum owns, let alone what Optum does.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @km+1kw2ct6s0

@gf How would you sell a company to its own subsidiary?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jr+1kw2ct6s0

If you look at finances, Optum is high margin. While it generates less revenue, it’s profitable. Why would you sell Optum? And UHC has a revenue cap to be compliant. Easy to keep more money by sending costs to Optum(which keeps the money under UHG).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j6+1kw2ct6s0

Optum being sold off to buyer, Wellmed!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gf+1kw2ct6s0

Interesting because they have moved a few departments back to UHC recently and it’s rumored there’s more to come.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dt+1kw2ct6s0

Before the acquisition by Optum, Optum IT was known as UHG IT. The IT organization was moved under Optum because customers purchasing Optum's services were uncomfortable having their employees call "UHG IT" for technical support, whereas they were comfortable contacting "Optum IT." I can't say that was the only reason for the change, but it was the explanation given to those who asked.

Like HR and Finance, IT is a cost center. These departments are essential to running the business, but they do not directly generate revenue.

Many of you who haven't been with the company very long may not know that the Help Desk phone number spells out UHT-DESK. That's a holdover from when IT was part of United as United Health Technologies (UHT) under UHG IT. While the phone number hasn't changed, the "UHT-DESK" mnemonic is no longer advertised as a way to remember it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c1+1kw2ct6s0

@OP would not be surprised at all if they sell all of Optum Health . They are an insurance co . They can't make enough " profit" in providing care - which conflicts with paying for care . The vertical integration will be broken up for all these companies that control every aspect of care - Monopolies

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b5+1kw2ct6s0

They’ll likely sell the entire company. It’s on very bad shape. Lots of bad decisions, some bad acquisitions, and tons of toxicity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ay+1kw2ct6s0

Not too long ago they rolled the Optum CXDP UX design team into UHC design team, and soon after began to RIF designers from Optum. This will likely continue, as evidenced in practically no new UX Design roles being hired in the US - it's all India now. Just check the company job boards. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a sell off from parts of Optum. The care delivery side seems to really be struggling. Government is cracking down on PBMs (not to say the feds "acceptance" can't be paid for).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1kw2ct6s0

I think you would want to be on the side that gets sold

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ap+1kw2ct6s0

" want to preface everything with the fact that I have no idea if they’re actually planning to absorb minimal tech resources into UHG and then sell Optum. "

For what it's worth, Optum Tech already reports into UHG CFO, not Optum's CEO....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1kw2ct6s0

I have been part of the core optum workflow that has serviced providers, claims, benefits, etc for over 10 years. Any time our app was down, the business felt the pain. I was Optum everything as far as my organization went.

Well my team was officially moved to "UHC tech" (an org I didnt even know existed until this year) in January.

Make of that what you will.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1kw2ct6s0

I could see it being a thing. They’d probably keep the PBM stuff, but tech just looks like overhead on a balance sheet. I’m sure they’d also like to distance themselves from cybersecurity risks and the inevitable (albeit distant) regulation of emerging technologies such as AI and quantum computing.

IBM did something similar when they spunoff Kyndryl. All the boring stuff with minimal profit margins went with Kyndryl so that IBM looked more profitable to shareholders.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1kw2ct6s0

No they will not sell. Logic, IT will become expensive. And how would you meet ACA mandate of 80% spend without ability to set price on service and rx? And show profit outside of insurance to claw back as subsidiary service. While main company meets spend mandates.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1kw2ct6s0

Post a reply

: