Are there any actual discussions at the manager or director level regarding the specific people on the layoff list?
I’m curious if they actually compare everyone's skills, experience, and output before the list is finalized, or if it’s all just decided at the discretion of senior management.
I wish they could just fire the useless VP’s in ESG . They just safeguard their closed ones and keep their closed ones during layoffs
It has been years since being acquired by Broadcom, ESG management team deliberately chose mediocre leadership.
Symantec E It has been years since being acquired by Broadcom
managers pull this list out from their derriere only saving their sycophants just like everywhere else
Start from the so-called “leadership”. VP, directors, architects, managers.
@a2 So he goes against company policy deliberately? Karma is going to bite someday!
Does anyone have solid information if the layoff list has already been finalized ?
Is the ESG list submitted to Sri yet?
@n3 word is VCF going from 6k to 4k so 33% for that org
PSO just got some layoffs today
@n3 I don't think anyone knows, but there might still be layoffs before Sept. 4 due to reorg
what percent is going to be let go this oct?
@gd I believe the layoff list is being made now.
Those in power keep those they like, the usual.
Has the list been already made ?
They pick names out of a hat.
I don't know about the other teams, but in Security Response, I heard that the director only gives numbers to the managers and they have to hand out engineers to meet those numbers for layoffs.
There is no discussion regarding skills, experience, or output at all. He even protects some remote workers over office workers, even though they produce less output than the office workers. He does this because of his personal preference.