How many people are above 60%?
23 replies (most recent on top)
@h0 it was though. 11 days was the official metric because it got you to 100%. This concept really isn't that hard lol
@g6 It got you to 100%, but it wasn't an OFFICIAL METRIC. Reading comprehension is once again nowhere to be found in this hellscape.
@gm Nice.
I’ve been doing my 3 days a month for over a year and was at 69% for the 3 month average.
@cc 11 days per month got you to 100% in the original metric they set up. So, yea. It was 11 days per month. It wasn't some made up number. That's literally what got you to your 100%. I'd far rather have that back than this 60% sh-t. As much as I hate this whole thing it was a lot more attainable.
@a5 I think this is the case for a decent amount of people. And honestly at this point, what the fu-k ever. If they're going to lay me off, they're going to lay me off. If they want to short me a bonus or a raise over the first 3 months of the year, so be it. This is the hill they've decided to die on, and I've got the documentation to prove the moved the goal posts. I'm coming in my 60.01% for the rest of the year and calling it a day.
@bq F-u-c-k You!
- Remote Employee
Does a year-end performance review still count attendance from January through March if my rate dipped below 60% for those first three months, even though I brought it back up above 60% for the rest of the year and hit a 60% Year-To-Date average overall?
@bq As someone who's just a random "butt in seat" and worked remote for a decade before the pandemic since my business line doesn't exist in my hub, I don't recall the bank failing when ALL of us were remote during Covid, do you?
Nope, currently averaging 47%, hopefully just affects a little of annual performance only.
@bh "11 days per month" was never an official metric, it was the number of days per month employees figured out would achieve the bare minimum.
I was at 60% one month this year (at least since April when they made the change). Otherwise I've usually been 1-2 days short each month. My manager doesn't seem too concerned about it, and neither am I.
Nope
Not me.. give us better conditions to work in so we are not sick and we can actually come to an office. And where is the measurement on the remote workers and whether they are actually doing something?
I anticipated we would face this issue someday, which is why I never trusted the 11 days per month figure. Instead, I followed the Workday guideline, which has stated 3 or more days per week since January 2025. This approach helped me achieve a 60% target in Q1.
With acknowledgement that this thread is about YTD, keep in mind that the current metric is the average over each rolling three-month period. January, February, and March are no longer factoring into that.
If you've averaged more than 60% per each three-month period (Jan-Mar, Feb-Apr, Mar-May, Apr-Jun, May-Jul), you're fine.
If your May-Jul average is less than 60%, yes, you will have to work additional days in office to raise that average.
Copying from another thread:
- The "Working in the office: In-office attendance and reporting (Global)" article FAQs address this.
"Q. Am I held to the 'more than 60% in-office' expectation for Q1 2026 if the updated measurement approach didn't take effect until Q2 2026?
A. Yes, as the expectation of working three-plus days in the office was established and communicated over 12 months ago."
Reason being that three-plus Total Possible Working days in office each week in January, February, and March (not Adjusted Possible Working Days) averages at more than 60% and would have been achieved by employees following the expectation for Q1.
This isn't opinion or preference, just math.*
I'm at or above 60% all year despite how much I can't stand how management at this place treats me. I'm not going to give them any reason when the axes get pulled-out. I'd rather have a sh---y income than none.
@OP I am at 61.8. Mid year reviews must have been brutal for a lot of people. I see more people in the office. Not just my team but many other teams too. Even the bus has more seats filled. Wondering if other companies have cracked the whip.
Sitting at 52% 1st three months sc--wed me. Even hitting goal the rest of the year won't have me at 60% at the end of the yr. Should I start coming in extra days to hit the eoy 60% goal? My uppers said they were not taking in account the retroactive months when it first rolled out but this feels like maybe they will be now... I hate this bs.
I am and so is my team. Don't give them the bullets to shoot you with.
I’m at 54% first three months sc--wed me oh well
@a2 “Not I” is proper grammar.
I is at 59.5%.
Not me... sitting at like 53.7%