Activity monitoring directly incents inefficient and timewasting behavior, and punishes people who try to find efficiencies. Why do something in 10 minutes that could take 30, if you're just going to be punished for being idle for 20 minutes. Its a deeply stupid management decision, any benefit you see in being able to dodge severance costs is going to be offset by losses in efficiencies. Especially if you're blindly implementing monitoring across the board. Anyway, since there started to be rumors about activity monitoring, I've been deliberately aligning my work style to meet the new measures.
I used to have a bunch of outlook rules to manage my inbox, I've scotched all of those and now click and scroll through every email individually. I try to reply to most of them as well.
I used to multitask during useless meetings and try to get ahead on other tasks. Unless I'm pressed for time/on a deadline, I no longer do this. I drag tasks out rather than multitasking.
I'm more prone to set up meetings than to send teams messages or emails.
Everything I produce, I feed it to copilot and ask it to review and annotate. Sometimes I will do this for multiple interations. Most of the time this results in few or no adjustments (I'm not a huge fan of AI), but its a pretty passive process and easy way to appear like you're doing work. Also runs up the AI bills
Would welcome other suggestions for dealing with the new regime