#leadership

Looks like VPs are starting their exits now. We went from a skeleton crew to barely any bones left. Don’t spend that AIP payout because who knows what the next few weeks are going to look like. So long fellow associates who have been here long enough to remember the good old days when we had real leadership and transparency.

I saw some comments about how there is a push from leadership to restructure teams into a 30:70 - U.S.:HIH split.

I wanted to see if multiple people can verify this.

I know HIH is growing and they’re cutting US FTE but how true is the 30:70 split? If it’s true, then that’s all of us finished in the US

My impression: it's time for a change.
Raul has changed the Exec Board, tried a lot of things. Nothing helped.
Now a new leader will be looked for, with a new approach, new cronies.
It might take some month still, but I got a feeling the exchange of the CEO is inevitable.

What's your impression?

If leadership insists that work is most productive within office walls, I’m happy to lean into that philosophy. Moving forward, my office hours are my only hours. The 'after-hours' emails and evening catch-up sessions from the couch are over. If the goal is a strict office environment, then the work stays at the desk. Naturally, my output will reflect the loss of those extra 'home hours'—my metrics are already showing the dip compared to last year—but I’m simply following the new standard set for us.

Here we are in 2026:

https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/ford-deep-water-after-sweeping-recalls-hit-every-model-since-2020-one-exception

(Ford only built 1,350 of the one exception, unrecalled GTs.)

Did Farley miss any bonuses?

Farley in 2022: Ford F-150 Lightning has exceeded Ford’s expectations as 200,000+ customers lined up to reserve one… exceeded production capacity for the 2022 model year.

Ford sold 15,617 units of the F-150 Lightning in 2022.

Did Farley miss any bonuses?

We pay our dues and when the contract is due, another benefit gets eliminated. Why do union leaders make so much money and NOT produce for the members?

Question for current DXC employees. Looking for honest perspectives from inside the company.

From the outside it often feels like DXC has been stuck in a long turnaround story. But what does it actually feel like to work there right now?

A few things I’m curious about:

How much do you hate or like working at the company?

What’s morale like inside your team?

Are your projects and client relationships growing, or mostly shrinking?

Do you feel like anything meaningful is actually changing at the company?

Are talented people on your team staying or are they leaving?

Is your manager engaged with your team or mostly invisible?

Do you feel leadership communicates clearly about what they are doing to grow the company or does it feel vague?

Are new projects focused on modern tech (cloud/AI) or mostly legacy systems?

How realistic are internal targets and deadlines?

Do teams feel stable or is there constant reorganization?

Do you feel the company invests in employee development or mostly focuses on cost cutting?

Would you recommend a friend to join DXC right now?

Really interested in real experiences from people inside the company...

Ship all tech to ITC that’s fine but don’t leave me at PHK.
ITC is not comfortable talking to the biz or leaders so unless you put it all in their hands, they will defer to those left at PHK.
Has to be all or nothing or you have a few at PHK doing all the legwork with wasted money in ITC.

Morale is in the gutter, and leadership clearly doesn’t care about keeping people motivated.
It’s ki-ling my ability to concentrate. Everything feels pointless when your work could vanish any day.
For anyone who’s been through this:

• How do you force yourself to stay productive?
• Do you keep performing at a high level, or just coast until it’s over?

Appreciate any realistic advice—especially from people who’ve survived multiple rounds.

what are your thoughts on shanon as the new AI leader compared to savnay? do you think she has a vision to turn it into a core flagship offering or will it remain optional feature with limited adoption?

People who communicated clearly and made you believe in the direction. Those people are gone. The ones running things now, I can't even follow their sentences half the time. Don't even get me started on the strategy. No idea what it is. They promote people who sound good in meetings but can't actually lead. And then they wonder why the good ones keep walking.

that senior leadership has "carried a bag" at some point in their career and been successful. Leadership like that came from other roles like ops (ww) etc have no idea of what it takes to be successful in outside sales. They pat themselves on thr back because they can read a spreadsheet. Meanwhile the rest of us that grind it out month after month have to listen to their bs.

I’ve been here long enough to see the pattern clearly, where we start projects with great enthusiasm, teams form, plans get made, and work begins with real momentum. Then a few months in someone in leadership reads an article or hears a new buzzword and everything changes, new priorities appear, old projects suddenly get labeled as not aligned, and the goal posts move so far you can barely see them anymore.

We end up abandoning half finished work and starting fresh on whatever the new thing is supposed to be, and the amount of wasted effort that piles up from that cycle is staggering because hours, weeks, and months of people’s time just get discarded when leadership cannot stick with a direction.

Then leadership turns around and wonders why execution is a problem, even though you cannot execute anything when the target keeps moving before the work ever has a chance to finish.

I've stopped bringing ideas up. What's the point? The people running Humana are all friends. They protect each other, promote each other, cover for each other. Anyone outside that circle might as well be invisible. You could have the best idea in the world and they'd still find a reason to say no. Not because it's bad, but because you're not one of them.

There was a time they would have addressed it, or at least pretended to. Leadership these days doesn't seem to care. It's bizarre. You get the feeling that if everything fell apart, they wouldn't blink. I guess astronomical income has a way of making you deeply uninterested in what happens next.

We've been losing so many people for so long, especially the talented ones. If leadership came up with the perfect plan right now, we couldn't implement it. We're past the threshold. We've lost the capacity and the institutional knowledge to pull it off. That last big push was our final shot, in my opinion. And we blew it.

The last couple of years under the current regime has been a disaster the current "leadership" of AS, MC and CH has run this business into the ground

The best leaders of the last 10 years have been laid off.

It's all meetings about meetings and reports about reports. It slows everything down. Not that anybody among leadership cares, mind you. It's just the new way of doing things.

It used to be that if you got hired here, you had a future. Different roles, regular raises, promotions from within. Real job security. Leadership today doesn't seem to care about building a stable workforce. That old model means nothing to them now.

Supported you? Managed thoughtfully? Tried to understand people's strengths and assign work accordingly? Do they even fully understand what your team does?

Mine might as well be from another planet. Great at office politics, useless at the actual work, and convinced that passive-aggressive behavior equals authority. I don't think anyone would notice, or work would suffer, if they were gone tomorrow.

I've never seen or heard of a private equity takeover that didn't gut the company. Always ends in disaster. Unless you're a cash cow with zero effort, which we're definitely not.

I've worked here five years (it feels much longer, though) and I'm still surprised by the decisions leadership makes. It's like common sense goes out the window once you reach a certain level. They roll out policies that actively make our jobs harder. They invest in technology that doesn't work. They promote people who have no idea how to manage. I don't know if it's always been this way or if it's getting worse, but the overall stupidity is hard to ignore.

I've noticed a significant shift lately. There's a huge focus on tracking work instead of doing it. We spend hours building decks to show productivity while actual tasks sit waiting. Meanwhile, there's a push to reduce small benefits that made the place at least tolerable. Sadly, the people who suffer most are the newer hires. They're thrown into projects without any real guidance because the seasoned leaders are too buried in administrative work to mentor anyone. It's a frustrating way to run things.

I started with the company back in 2015 and I've seen four different management structures. The pattern is always the same. You get a manager who is charming in meetings but completely absent when you need support. I recently had a weekly catch-up that started giving me a knot in my stomach. It was never about development or help, just a list of things that needed to be done yesterday. I finally updated my resume this week. It feels like the only way to protect your peace is to leave.

To those who are feeling anxious about layoffs, I want to share my perspective after spending more than a decade at the company.

In many cases, decisions during layoffs are not purely based on performance. Managers and senior leaders often try to protect themselves using the power and influence they have, unless you happen to be very close to top leadership. At times, it becomes more about internal politics and job preservation than merit.

At the same time, no company defines your entire career. It is important not to become overly attached to any organization. Companies may make decisions that do not always reflect your value. If you are affected, focus on preparing financially, continue building your skills, and work hard to find the next opportunity.

One concern that deserves attention is when Oracle layoffs affect citizens while H1B employees are retained, even when both groups are working equally hard. If such patterns exist, they should be carefully examined by leadership and policymakers. The responsibility for these practices lies with certain managers, directors, senior directors, and VPs, not the company as a whole.

Only new visionary leadership at the top; EVPs, SVPs, and GVPs especially those with strong AI and technology perspectives, can help guide teams into the future.

Layoffs may sometimes be unavoidable, but the process must be fair, transparent, and thoughtful. Otherwise, companies risk losing talented and dedicated people who contribute greatly to their AI success.

If you are affected by layoffs, it does not mean you are not talented or that you performed poorly. As discussed above, many factors influence such decisions. You are talented, and that is why you were valued in your role.

You will find another opportunity. Take this time to relax, manage your spending, make the most of your severance, take care of your mental health, and get insurance coverage through Covered California. Use this period to upgrade your skills, especially in AI and emerging technologies.

Then start applying. The job market may take some time, but persistence pays off, and you will eventually land the right role. Stay positive, never give up, and good luck. You have got this.

Now Ed Garden, one of Fortune Brands largest shareholders, disagrees with the new pick of CEO Amit Banati and has a list of his potential candidates that will allegedly be presented at the next shareholder meeting.

While shareholders are critical, tunnel vision focus on share price alone allows for short term goals and does not set up a company for long term success. Share price is the reward of doing everything else correct including, but not limited to, having the right people, the right plan, and executing the plan.

Store managers, District Leaders, and Regional Directors, please remember this:

When a dedicated, loyal, hardworking employee gets the same "3" rating (and same cr-ppy raise) as a slacker employee who skates by doing bare minimum nothing, all motivation for hard work is lost when said dedicated employee realizes that hard work is no longer rewarded. STOP lumping everyone together as average and start viewing everyone individually. Every team has those people who go above and beyond and do more than others. They deserve to be rated 4 or 5, not cut down to 3 because everything needs to "balance out". Fight for your people, because that's what a good leader does.

Leadership is laser-focused on OPEX cuts, and every signal points to around 15,000 jobs still being on the line. That's the number floating around, the one nobody's refuted, the one we all know is coming for us eventually. Whether it happens next week or next month changes nothing in the end. It's happening. The only things left to figure out is how many rounds, and who's getting cut. Prepare accordingly.

It doesn't matter in the end. If your number's up, you're gone, and the only reason is the bottom line. Don't ki-l yourself trying to prove your worth. You'll just regret the wasted effort later. Nobody's indispensable to leadership, especially when there's no growth strategy anyway.

Just when you think this man can’t get any more shallow, he blasts out the most cringe, self‑congratulatory “newsletter” ever written. It’s basically a shrine to himself, wall‑to‑wall “me, me, I, I, my, my.”
And then he has the nerve to act proud that he and his leadership team got “partially met.” Buddy, that’s not a mystery. That’s a mirror. Your team’s performance is a direct reflection of your leadership. Ask your smiling as-----n CHRO or maybe BarUp can help you lift your performance. OA’s leadership culture and that tired consulting‑playbook theater are the real anchors dragging the place down. He missed his management plan, maybe the plan was delusional from the start. He forced everyone into individual OKRs, hyper‑individualized, disconnected targets, then turns around and scolds people for not hitting his inflated management plan. A plan they didn’t set. He did. Based on his AI‑fantasy PowerPoint dreams, air‑game, strategy, and “leapfrog on a wing and a prayer” marketing nonsense with a Spineless Tech consultant who talks but can’t do and lives in a fantasy land wishing he was a Silicon Valley coder praying he doesn’t get fired. Now he’s laying off talent and skills that we actually took from cognisant to rebuild our own internal technology capability. Now he’s handing it all back out to same old vendors who have sc--wed us over for years paying more for cr-p quality and same old service because he promised them work in exchange for buying VG’s cr-p products. This regime ignore the loyalty hard work and service of all the hard working teams and lay them off giving work to his “partners” instead. Then has the audacity and mind blindness to realise that he’s two faced telling Davos he invests in people - what an empty suit!! Meanwhile, in the real world, the entire company is already paying for OA’s failure. The share price is in freefall, but he blames “external forces.” Bonuses are below target yet again, and he blames the staff for not delivering on his overblown plan. Employees get a raise barely big enough to buy a Happy Meal, while OA buys himself “garden shed time” at Davos, sipping champagne and pretending he’s a visionary, signing MOU with provinces no one heard of - all theatre ….And let’s be real, bet his “partially met” will still come with a ski trip, nice pile of cash in his bank and more first class flying luxuries the rest of us will never see in our lifetimes despite working all the hours God sends. Maybe that “partially met” is actually the most honest performance review he’s ever had. He can’t deliver on his own plan. The share price is the scoreboard, and everyone can see the score. This is what happens when you hand a real company to consultants who’ve never built anything, never run anything, never delivered anything - just recycled textbook jargon, “pivots,” and Microsoft copycat acting only made worse by their shameless LinkedIn self‑promotion. It’s embarrassing. Oh and let’s not forget he imported in his second‑hand‑car‑salesman sidekick, VG, to sell vapourware and popsicle products no one wants only hitting targets by strong‑arming suppliers into buying before they can even play and calling it “deals and partnerships” what a joke. That’s when you know the ship is sinking. And the final sign? When a CFO who’s served the company for 25 years decides she’s done. Just look at the numbers: under her six‑year CFO tenure, the share price went up 30%. Under his two‑year reign, it’s down 30%. No wonder SJ walked away. She can smell the BS from a mile off. Time to follow in her footsteps and exit this sinking ship.

So I am hearing tech leadership is moving up the ladder ?

Voting Instructions

For the annual meeting of Texas Instruments, please record the following votes:

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors: AGAINST
I am voting against the election of the board of directors, including CEO Haviv Ilan. In my view, current leadership decisions are negatively impacting the company’s culture and employee morale. Strong leadership and culture are critical for sustaining innovation and long-term performance at Texas Instruments.

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation: AGAINST
I am voting against the executive compensation package because compensation decisions appear misaligned with employee outcomes, particularly the reduction of profit-sharing for employees beginning in 2027.

How to Submit Your Proxy Vote

1.  Go to the proxy voting site listed on your proxy card: https://www.proxyvote.com
2.  Enter the 16-digit control number from your proxy card or email.
3.  Select your voting choices for each proposal.
4.  Submit your vote electronically and confirm.

Key executives at Five9 have recently cashed out notable amounts of company stock. SVP & CAO Leena Mansharamani sold 1,926 shares for a total of $34,417. Chief Administrative & Legal Officer Tiffany N. Meriweather executed a larger sale of 5,942 shares, netting $106,183. Meanwhile, CRO Matthew E. Tuckness sold 5,164 shares, generating proceeds of $92,280. These insider transactions highlight a series of significant stock disposals by senior leadership at Five9

OVV has assembled the weakest and most incompetent Executive Team in the history of Oil and Gas! Doug, please come back and clean this mess up!

Considering they demoted the majority of sr managers last February... Which su-ks bc my manager was AMAZING! New manager/director is cool but he has no clue wtf we do on a daily basis and has no personal relationship with any of us.

I've never gotten below a 4% raise so hoping for a 6% this year at least.

I am noticing that threads about certain GTS leaders getting deleted. Just for asking if they are leaving or not.
I do not see threads getting deleted for any other leaders.

Directors that say yes to every request from VPs no matter how ridiculous or last minute the ask continue to survive. They have their head so far up the VPs a$$ hoping to advance their own career with no regard to their team. Truly a good ole boys club at that level. At the end of the day every employee is just a number with a salary that will be the deciding factor in the next round of layoffs. No amount of extra effort will be taken in to consideration, so take your PTO and enjoy time with friends and family.

Is the lack of managerial support a new Humana tactic to quiet fire employees? Have you noticed a lack of leadership? I have and I’m pretty sure Humana is using this new tactic to motivate you to leave.