#employeerelations

Posts mentioning hashtag #employeerelations

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #employeerelations.

Mention #employeerelations in your post to continue the discussion!

Being a psuedo-NTT employee

We may get our paychecks from NTT and have an NTT email address, but we're still the serfs or property of the 'Other company'. Nothing has changed for us, other than throwing a couple of NTT managers into the mix. The toxicity, gas-lighting and manipulation hasn't gone away, infact there is little more of it from the NTT side now.

Also it has become apparent that there are different variables or opportunities that come into play as compared to a real NTT employee. And that is we have none. Instead of being mentored or given the opportunities to further the paths of our own choosing. Obstacles are thrown in our way and under the table deals are forged to prevent one from pursuing anything other than what has been dictated or desired by those above us.

Should you voice your concerns or issues to a manager. Expect the repertoire of how everything is your fault and have your tried to find employment with another company.

If one could sum it up, it would be in the song 'Hotel California'.


Are there any CSC employees still left in the USA?

I worked for the CSC and got JE last year. I could tell it was coming because a lot of our work was being moved to India and they were lying to the employees about it. The customers started complaining because of the language barrier and general lack of knowledge of these overseas agents. Does anyone knows the current status of the CSC? Are there any employees still left in the USA or is it entirely in India now?


Manager Guidance for Strategic Realignment Discussions

Following are brief recommendations on how Managers may approach Strategic Realignment discussions with associates:

  1. Opening Remarks (Smile, but not too much)
  • “Thank you all for joining today’s discussion about our exciting next phase.”
  • “This initiative is part of our commitment to agility, efficiency, and other words that sound positive but mean ‘change is coming.’”
  • “I want to reassure you that this is not a layoff. It is a realignment. The difference is mostly semantic, but Legal insists we say it.”
  1. Key Messages to Deliver (Without Laughing)
    A. “We are evolving as an organization.”
    This means:
    We are eliminating roles, but we’re calling it evolution so it sounds like nature’s fault.
    B. “We are aligning talent with business needs.”
    This means:
    Some of you are no longer aligned with the business.
    Or the business is no longer aligned with you.
    Either way, alignment is ending.
    C. “We are optimizing our global footprint.”
    This means:
    Your job is moving to a place where the company pays people in gratitude and snacks.
    D. “We are committed to transparency.”
    This means:
    We will tell you everything we can, except the things we can’t, which are most things.

  2. How to Answer Employee Questions (Without Actually Answering)
    Q: “Is my job safe?”
    A: “Great question. What I can say is that every role is being evaluated for future alignment.”
    (Translation: No.)
    Q: “Why did my performance rating drop?”
    A: “We’re using a new calibration model to ensure fairness and consistency.”
    (Translation: We needed numbers.)
    Q: “Why didn’t we issue a WARN notice?”
    A: “We are fully compliant with all regulations and are executing changes in a phased, thoughtful manner.”
    (Translation: We sliced the layoffs into tiny pieces like a corporate ninja.)
    Q: “Why is my role moving to Pune?”
    A: “We’re leveraging global centers of excellence to maximize efficiency.”
    (Translation: Labor arbitrage.)
    Q: “Why do I have to return to the office when my team is remote?”
    A: “RTO strengthens collaboration and culture.”
    (Translation: Attrition tool.)

  3. Tone Guidance (HR Requires This Section)

  • Be empathetic, but not so empathetic that employees think you can help them.
  • Be supportive, but not so supportive that employees think you know what’s going on.
  • Be confident, but not so confident that employees think you’re safe either.
  • Avoid humor, unless it’s the unintentional kind created by corporate jargon.
  1. Phrases You Must Use (Even If They Make No Sense)
  • “Future‑ready workforce”
  • “Talent optimization”
  • “Cross‑functional agility”
  • “Global alignment”
  • “Strategic redeployment”
  • “Enhanced operational cadence”
  • “Employee‑centric transition pathways”
  • “Right‑sizing for long‑term success”
    (Note: Do not use the word “layoff.” HR will appear behind you like a ghost.)
  1. Phrases You Must Avoid (At All Costs)
  • “Layoff”
  • “Firing”
  • “Job elimination”
  • “Cost‑cutting”
  • “Offshoring”
  • “WARN Act”
  • “Unemployment insurance”
  • “My badge didn’t work this morning either”
  1. Closing Script (Read Slowly, With Forced Optimism)
  • “I want to thank each of you for your continued dedication during this exciting period of transformation.”
  • “We are confident that this realignment will position us for long‑term success.”
  • “Please check Workday for updates to your role, location, reporting structure, job title, and employment status.”
  • “If you have questions, please reach out to HR. They have been fully briefed on how to not answer them.”
  1. Manager Reminder
    If anyone asks you a question you don’t know how to answer, simply say:
    “We’re still finalizing details.”
    This phrase is legally safe, emotionally neutral, and universally applicable.

I have the biggest idgaf attitude

Not entertaining sh-t anymore and not doing anythjng extra. As someone forced wfh, im not reaping the benefits of any hard work and have watched peers who have no competent cell in their brain get promoted. Now idgaf and will do bare minimum. Staff wants to fu-k off. Oh well i’ll mark them meets regardless. Doesnt matter anyone when hi---r and his hr crew falsify performance anyway so why not let them fu-k off more than they do


I hate having to chose silence

I’ll write out a full response pushing back on a bad decision or unfair comment, then sit there staring at it. Pushing back sounds reasonable in my head, but I also know full well it's an easy way to get labeled as difficult by management. So I delete it and stay quiet, not because I agree, but because protecting my reputation feels safer than being right. It's exhausting having to police myself like that.


I'm so sick and tired of layoffs and reorgs and whatnots

Shouldn't we be operating at peak efficiency by now considering how many times we've had to go through optimizations and reorganizations, all accompanied by layoffs? Yet I never see any improvements after any of these, I only see things become progressively worse.


RTO Phase 2 and Remote Employees

Has anyone heard when Phase 2 of RTO will take place? Assuming outer offices will return 5 days and remote employees given a chance to move closer to an office. Do we think management has already been fighting for remote works to be given an exception ( I’m referring to those in Sales)


MST home dispatch techs still use and abuse program is going away

MST home dispatch tech use and abuse company assets. They drive 100K-200K bucket trucks to their home and back to their home garage everyday. Big V8 6.3 L engines use a lot of gas and insurance on top. Also, with MST high pay and only have .5 job per tech a day per tech how is that saving company money and liability.
There are rules to follow when joining home dispatch program. Following the rules helps save gas and time and wear and tear on a vehicle used to drive to work and to home. But MSTs abuse this program from driving to the garage every day and dispatching at the garage. Making a stop at the grocery store to grocery shop in the company vehicle before driving home. Not closing your last job at the job site and instead, drive home and being still dispatched on your work ticket and then closing the job when you arrive home. I follow the rules, and I do not want the home dispatch program to go away because of MSTs taking advantage of the abuse. Also, MST managers are favoring many MSTs and letting the home dispatch MSTs do what ever they want. STOP ABUSING THE HOME DISPATCH PROGRAM YOU MSTs. You know who you are...


The word of the day is 'Hypocrisy'

Do as I say and not as I do and you'll go far at Gainwell. That should be the motto and on all the employee literature.

We'll change the rules all of a sudden and tell you it's always been that way. And you're supposed to believe it. <- Sounds like a cult, right...

Regular employee makes a mistake and it's the end of the world. A manager makes a mistake 20 times worse and it was simply a forgivable human error.

Multiple managers want you to put together a statement, each with their own sl--t to the story. <- It's all the same truth, right.....

Make a promise to gain what you want, then pull the promise with the worst reason ever.

All this in one day, living the dream folks.


Is the below from a VZ insider true?

I found this response from the post titled "R2 layoff chatter is fake news" from earlier today

"@OP I was in Finance. Until they asked me to move to BR, then offered me the standard year buyout since I decided not to move to the armpit of the world (that information should tell you my level.)

There is another five-figure layoff coming about a month post consolidation. Then ~5k in Q4 again. That was plan A. Plan B was ~5k now, and five-figure in Q4, depending on how well QAM-less TV goes (how many onshore engineers they need to fix things) and how quickly/easily Frontier comes online.

Don't forget the 6k heads from Starry, as well, that'll be coming in April. Which will not be profitable, and will fold like a cr-ppy pair of BlueJeans. Or the brilliant Lowell acquisitions of AOL and Yahoo.

Target HC (the key metric for layoffs) is ~78,500 heads.

I just accepted an offer with a growing company (more money, but have to be in office; can't be perfect, I guess.) Cashed out my (frozen, small) pension and stock together awards to an IRA, with stocks that actually perform.

I enjoyed the semi-continuous axe swinging for my 26y, made good money (but not great, after testing the market), left with a fat check to go make more elsewhere.

Telecom has become a race to the bottom. That'll necessitate less HC, lower salaries, and smaller businesses. You're going to see more reductions, with a far smaller RIF package in the future. I worked through the BCs. It's coming.

Couldn't be happier to be out..."


"stack ranking" or "relative grading" system

I am questioning the legal and ethical implications of this 'relative grading' framework within a publicly traded organization like WF. I would like to know where employees can formally inquiry about the compliance of this policy or file a grievance regarding its implementation. Beyond the legalities, this system reflects a culture shift that prioritizes internal competition over sustainable performance. It raises a critical question for all of us: is this an environment that truly values its talent, and is it a place where long-term career growth is still viable?

WF has formally adopted a 'Stack Ranking' (or relative grading) framework. This methodology is a documented corporate policy, with comprehensive manager training sessions to standardize its implementation.

For example,when a manager uses a 200% (just example here) performer as the baseline, several things happen:
Burnout: When "doing the job" is no longer the standard, and instead "beating the best" is the goal, employees eventually hit a wall.

Toxic Competition: Colleagues stop helping each other because your success might lower my rating.

The "Moving Goalpost" Problem: If everyone improves, the 200% bar just moves higher, and someone is still stuck at the bottom regardless of their actual output.


What is ailing big bank?

Go to any of the other banks' board on layoff.com and it's the same as Citi - people complaining about RIF's, forced low rankings, little raise completely out of touch with modern inflation and lowered bonuses...bank of america, JP, Wells, BNY, State Street. All of those boards look identitical to Citi's layoff board. Yet, bank's profits, including Citi, are high and stocks at record highs.

What's the issue for such low employee morale at big banks?


Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of NJ To Cut 242 Jobs by April Amid Financial Pressures

Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey will lay off 242 employees by April 26. A Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification filing confirmed this. The cuts slice away nearly 5% of the company's U.S. workforce.

https://wrat.com/2026/02/05/horizon-blue-cross-blue-shield-of-nj-to-cut-242-jobs-by-april-amid-financial-pressures/


No layoffs in 2026

I have talked to several Betriebsrat members and HRBP. I also had a conversation with a member of the supervisory board. Here’s my perspective.

Layoffs are a last resort. CK and the board intend to resort to them only if the share price falls below €150 in Europe. This would enable them to push it back over €165, which would be a relief. Otherwise, it serves as a bargaining chip.

How does it function as a bargaining chip? The executive board members lack empathy. They often say so many inappropriate things about employees that they spend a significant portion of an earnings call apologizing for their previous comments.

Layoffs can decrease the number of elected Betriebsrat and Supervisory Board members.
Layoffs foster a submissive workforce that complies with management directives.
Layoffs are particularly challenging to implement in Germany, France, and other European nations.
Layoffs are costly and will diminish the funds the board wants to allocate for share buybacks.
Layoffs will attract negative media attention and lead to expensive PR costs.

Even if layoffs occur, they will NOT target the highly paid executives and area heads and managers earning over €250k annually. Their backing is too crucial for the board. Therefore, if layoffs do take place, SAP will likely let go of thousands of employees who are not deemed worthy. Like you and I.

But then how is it a negotiation tool? Well, it's what made performance management possible. It allowed them to cancel or reduce almost all benefits. And it enabled them to decrease salary budget this year. A lot of job postings have been pulled and we're in a semi hiring freeze. Travel budget is close to non-existent for teams yet executives and managers are able to travel a lot.

They won. They created a hostile atmosphere where everyone is scared to speak up. And they will continue to threaten us with layoffs till there is no spirit left in anyone at the company.

But this is just my theory and I don't know this for sure. What are your thoughts?


Corporate DEI Index Sees 65% Drop

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/04/corporate-dei-index-hrc.html

When is Shell going to end its involvement with the HRC racket?

Last year leaders were told to remove DEI targets from their GPAs but were told to keep it under wraps. They're trying to play both sides of the fence on this stuff.


Dell UK workers are organising

Dell workers in the UK are currently in active discussions with the CWU and UTAW and senior Labour MPs to secure trade union recognition.

For too long, inaccurate information has circulated within Dell UK claiming that Dell does not recognise trade unions. This is false. UK law is clear and gives workers the right to organise and to be represented by a trade union.

The legal process is as follows:

1.  A trade union must formally request voluntary recognition from the employer. This request will be made within the next two weeks.
2.  If Dell refuses voluntary recognition, the union has the legal right to apply to the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) for statutory recognition.

To win statutory recognition, we must show that a majority of UK employees support union recognition, and that at least 10% of the workforce are union members. If an application is rejected, the law prevents us from applying again for three years. This makes it critical that we stand together and get this right the first time.

All UK workers are asking for is the same protections, voice, and representation already enjoyed by colleagues covered by workers’ councils.

In the coming weeks, leaflets and posters will be shared across UK sites with more information on how to get involved. Under UK law, workers have the right to trade union representation. The decision on whether Dell UK has a recognised trade union belongs to workers, not executive leadership.

Now is the time to organise.
Now is the time to stand together.
Now is the time to claim our legal right to a trade union.