#layoffs

Posts mentioning hashtag #layoffs

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #layoffs.

Mention #layoffs in your post to continue the discussion!

Spirit Airlines reverses temporary job cuts in New York

Spirit Airlines has rescinded its plans for temporary layoffs, meaning these job cuts will no longer proceed. The airline had previously announced its intention to implement temporary staffing reductions. This reversal means that employees who were facing these temporary job losses will now retain their positions. Spirit Airlines is the company directly affected by this decision. The rescinded layoffs were specifically planned for its operations in New York City.

https://pix11.com/news/local-news/queens/spirit-airlines-to-temporarily-layoff-hundreds-in-nyc/


SLC schools moved forward with $5 million in cuts, putting layoffs on the table

San Luis Coastal schools have approved substantial budget cuts totaling $5 million. This decision is directly setting the stage for impending layoffs within the district. The educational institution, located in San Luis, California, is facing significant financial restructuring. These budget reductions mean that job positions are at risk of being eliminated. Consequently, employees of San Luis Coastal schools can expect to be affected by these upcoming layoffs.

https://www.kcbx.org/education/2025-12-18/san-luis-coastal-schools-approve-5-million-in-budget-cuts-setting-stage-for-layoffs


Now entering the chaos phase

Knowing the management excellence and expedience, and the fact that there was no real plan beyond merciless cuts, who knows how long it will take for the dust to settle and for there to be even a semblance of an organized workflow. My team is already feeling the pain, and it’s only going to get worse in the coming months. We were stretched thin to begin with. It certainly didn’t help that they somehow managed to get rid of the very people who actually knew what they were doing.


2024 Layoffs

The 2024 layoff was an absolute cluster. The company basically lost an entire year due to one of the most inept corporate executions I've ever seen. Everything was at a standstill between December 2023, when JD made the layoff announcement, and September 2024, when EH came on board. Now think about a company of this size being at a standstill for a year... there was no way this was going to be a quick turnaround, regardless of what anyone said. Even if the layoffs made sense, their poor execution negated any impact it was supposed to have.


FuelCell Layoffs

FuelCell Energy Sees Revenue Increase, Cuts Staff

FuelCell Energy announced increased revenue for its fourth quarter. Quarterly revenue rose 12% to $55 million. The company also disclosed significant workforce reductions. The workforce was cut by approximately 28%, totaling 424 employees. These measures aim to reduce costs and focus on core technology. Loc: Danbury, Connecticut

https://hartfordbusiness.com/article/fuelcell-energy-posts-4q-revenue-growth-details-restructuring-and-layoffs-in-annual-report/


Red Lobster lays off about 200 restaurant employees

Red Lobster is laying off less than 200 restaurant-level employees in an effort to streamline operations and set it up for long-term growth.

The “targeted” cuts represent less than 1% of its workforce, the company said in a statement to Restaurant Business.

https://www.restaurantbusinessonline.com/workforce/red-lobster-lays-about-200-restaurant-employees


Life goes on

To those who are leaving Tomorrow, may God iluminate your new path and help find success on your new endevours.
To those who get to stay.... May you have peaceful and joyful holidays. Please leave this board for now ......Come back in about two/three months......


Metro on thin ice....

Yesterday, leadership stated that individual contributors will remain the primary model moving forward, and the entire organizational hierarchy is under review. There's talk from the C-suite about increasing the number of doors per RDM to between 20 and 30. At the same time, it appears they're planning to reduce the workforce by at least 20%, which would effectively double (and in some cases triple) the workload for remaining individual contributors. This comes at a time when these teams are already significantly reduced and stretched thin. It's frustrating to hear executives celebrate strong performance while simultaneously pushing for deep staff cuts. This feels like pure corporate greed on T-Mobile's part.


For the last several weeks of posts of discrepancies, disputes and down right obnoxious replies and posts.

Here is a breakdown of the key issues you've described and whether they are likely to have legal merit:
⚖️ Legal Merit of the Complaints:
It is highly unlikely that either of the actions described—the performance rating changes or the salary range consolidation—is illegal on its own, especially in the context of general U.S. employment law (which applies unless a specific country or state is mentioned).

  1. The Low Performance Ratings ("Forced Distribution")
    • The Law: In the U.S., the vast majority of employment is at-will. This means an employer can generally modify an employee's job duties, compensation, or even terminate them for any reason that is not illegal (i.e., not discriminatory).
    • Performance Reviews: Companies are legally allowed to change how they evaluate performance, introduce "forced distribution" (where a certain percentage must receive low ratings), and enforce stricter standards, even if it leads to ratings that employees feel are unfair or unexpected.
    • The Only Legal Challenge (Discrimination): A performance rating only becomes a potential legal issue if it can be proven that the rating was given based on illegal discrimination (e.g., race, gender, age, religion, disability, etc.) or in retaliation for engaging in a protected activity (like whistleblowing or reporting harassment).
    • The fact that many people are getting low ratings for the first time suggests a change in company policy, not necessarily individual illegal discrimination. For a lawsuit to succeed, a lawyer would need to show a pattern of discrimination against a protected class (e.g., "Only women received the 'Needs Improvement' rating," or "The rating was given right after I filed a formal complaint").
    • Conclusion: Being unhappy with a rating, or even feeling it was unfair, is generally not a legal issue.
  2. Consolidating Salary Ranges for Remote Employees
    • The Law: Employers are free to set, change, and consolidate salary ranges and structures. They can decide to use a single, consistent salary range for all remote employees, regardless of the employee's specific location, even if some employees were previously in a higher, location-based range.
    • The Only Legal Challenge (Pay Equity): The consolidation itself is not illegal. However, the resulting salaries would still need to comply with Equal Pay laws. These laws require that employees performing substantially similar work receive equal pay, regardless of s-x (or, in some states, other protected characteristics), unless the difference is based on a factor other than s-x (like seniority, merit, or a geographical pay difference).
    • In your case, the company is moving toward more consistency, which generally reduces pay equity risk based on location differences, not increases it.
    • Conclusion: The consolidation is a standard business decision regarding compensation structure and is generally not illegal.
      📝 The Importance of Documentation
      While the actions are likely legal, the advice to document everything is still very sound advice.
    • For the Employee: Documentation helps establish a clear timeline and the company's reasoning. If an employee is eventually terminated, this documentation could be crucial evidence if they believe they have grounds for a lawsuit (i.e., if they can show the ratings were pretext for a discriminatory or retaliatory firing).
    • What to Document:
    • The New Rating: The exact rating, the written feedback, and any meetings where it was discussed.
    • Prior Performance: Previous high ratings, positive emails, and concrete examples of work that exceeded expectations before the change.
    • The Salary Change: The communication about the new salary band and how it was communicated.
    • The Thread: The general timeline and tenor of the complaints from peers.
      💡 Summary for the Thread
      Based on general U.S. employment law:
    • The actions are likely legal. Companies have wide latitude to change performance review systems and compensation structures.
    • A lawsuit would require proof of illegal discrimination or retaliation. General unfairness or bad management is not grounds for a legal case.
    • Documentation is still smart. It protects the employee by creating an evidence trail should they need to challenge the company on legitimate grounds (like discrimination) in the future.
      The best next steps for people on the thread would be to research the specific employment laws in their state and, if they suspect their individual rating or pay was based on an illegal factor like race, gender, or religion, then they should consult with an employment attorney.

US in a Recession

Unemployment is near the 2008 housing crash level and the year is not even over yet. The Feds have activated the money printer on December 12 in preparation for company bailouts. We have the Great Recession 2.0. Car loadings are low. Trains are running conventional left and right. Post your thoughts 2026 here.


Bleak outlook for next 2 years

Anyone drinking the Kool-Aid still? Read this: https://simplywall.st/community/narratives/us/diversified-financials/nasdaq-fisv/fiserv/puwknbpq-tech-giants-blockchain-and-fee-pressures-will-erode-profitability-e9qo/updates/3-3-analysts-have-slashed-our-fiserv-fair-value-estimate-from-ab?utm_source=Braze&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CommunityDigest


Security in the Houston area

For those that don’t know, the Verizon stores in the houston area have had armed security in their stores for the last 10+ years.

Today we were told that beginning 01/01/2026, the following stores (Cinco Ranch, Aliana, Fulshear) will no longer need police officers due to the restructuring.

I do not know if the stores will be converting to third party or shutting down but figured it would be good to give employees a heads up to start getting their personal affairs in order.


Most of older group of 8 of 18 RFEs (cell site designers (macro and SMC) in CARTN (part of GNT) riffed. Make network better?

The older workers pdf clearly showed a bias in laying off the older population of RFEs. A couple of very recent RFE hires were included in with the riffed group (to mask the age discrimination?). Were RFEs in other regions affected similarly?

Also, the CARTN RFE team already has approx. 20 contractors (not touched) supporting the build plan (entering data in the tools per the RFEs' directions, plus running plots for review by the RFEs). ALL of the 20 or so contractors appear to be from India (Amdocs, with the contractors in TX?). Are the contractors now going to planning the designs of the cell sites? How is the quality of the designs (new builds and modification projects) going to be affected given the relatively short time span contractors are working for VZ (through Amdocs)? Contractors do not have as much skin in the game as fulltime VZ employees, and it may take 6 months to a year and a half for poor quality work to show up in the network.

Really short sighted on the part of management.


Brian Pieninck announces layoffs

After laying off over 2000 employees in 2025, we were notified in an all hands meeting near the end of November that they were done with cuts "for the rest of the year." During an IT All Hands meeting in December, Brian announced that we should expect a 25-40% reduction in staff due to AI implementation (which they strongly pushed on everyone).


How can they let go people based on PIP?

With the high degree of managerial incompetence that is plaguing this company how does one mange to let himself be PIPed out ?
Proving that someone is incompetent and is not performing well requires some degree of technical sophistication that MOST of the managers we have are not capable of.
I have seen this a lot around here, oh they put me on a PIP. Technically it is very difficult to fake prove that someone is incompetent unless the person is indeed incompetent. The performance factor will always be arguable and no judge in this world will grant Cisco reasonable grounds for termination with the current workload level most of us have. Adding more to that to push you out is practically impossible. The current workload as is it is already border line, medically and from legal perspective.

So my opinion is that when I see that people are complaining about being PIPed out, is that they really needed to be


Merry Christmas

To all the managers that are giving bogus reviews and letting people go before Christmas, rest well... You could be next! Your job can be moved offshore at any time too. Keep drinking the Kool-aid they are serving. They are NOT for the employees. It's all about GREED! Merry Christmas!!!


Same leaders new positions in ISG and CSG

Dell is just moving the deck chairs around in the titanic for 2026. We’ve got the same leaders in ISG and CSG but in new positions because they’ve either laid off or the other good leaders quit or moved into different roles. Now we are stuck with the ignorant and arrogant. We are going to go through the same ideas but they’ll be “new” because they came from new, unqualified people who just have no business being in their roles. They way they got to them wasn’t by earning them but because people left or moved. Now we all have to deal with the “new” but not “new” ideas.

The realities are simple. We need better leadership. Leadership that’s not going to think they’re amazing but industry leaders with a real perspective on the industry.

Right now we’ve got a bunch of kids a$$ leaders who all have their own agenda. If you can leave in 2026 you should. It’s going to be a frustrating year.

BTW - hammer them on the eNPS.


Window installation hub in Fort Myers to close, cutting 19 jobs

Nineteen layoffs are expected in Fort Myers as a window installation hub prepares to close. An unnamed company operating the installation center is ceasing its operations. This decision will lead to significant job reductions for the local workforce. The closure marks the end of the window installation hub's presence in the city. The layoffs will directly affect 19 employees in Fort Myers.

https://www.businessobserverfl.com/news/2025/dec/17/layoffs-fort-myers-installation-hub-closes/